Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Zona Risiko Longsor Berbasis Geographic Information System Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Abstract
Kecamatan Berastagi, Kabupaten Karo, memiliki topografi perbukitan hingga pegunungan yang rentan longsor, sedangkan analisis kerawanan sebelumnya umumnya memakai skoring dengan batas kelas tegas dan berhenti pada peta statis. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis sebaran risiko longsor dan membangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) berbasis Geographic Information System (GIS) dengan metode Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (Fuzzy-MCDM). Lima kriteria digunakan, yaitu kemiringan lereng, curah hujan, jenis tanah, penggunaan lahan, dan jarak terhadap jalan, dengan bobot awal 0,30; 0,25; 0,20; 0,15; dan 0,10. Nilai tiap kriteria difuzzifikasi menggunakan fungsi keanggotaan linear naik, linear turun, dan nilai kategori, lalu diagregasi menjadi indeks risiko pada 10 titik data Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD) Kabupaten Karo. Hasil menunjukkan 3 titik (30%) berada pada zona risiko tinggi dan 7 titik (70%) pada zona sedang, tanpa titik pada zona rendah. Indeks tertinggi terdapat di Lereng Doulu (P09) sebesar 0,7198, dengan kemiringan lereng sebagai kontributor terbesar (rata-rata 35% dari indeks). Analisis sensitivitas pada empat skenario bobot alternatif menunjukkan jumlah titik zona tinggi berkisar 1–4 sehingga bobot perlu dikalibrasi dengan pendapat ahli. Sistem WebGIS berbasis PHP, MySQL, dan Leaflet.js yang dibangun lulus 11 skenario pengujian black box. Sistem ini dapat membantu penentuan prioritas mitigasi, dengan keterbatasan jumlah data dan belum adanya validasi statistik formal.
References
Abdi, A., Bouamrane, A., Karech, T., Dahri, N., & Kaouachi, A. (2021). Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based fuzzy logic and the analytical hierarchical processes approach: A case study in Constantine (North-East Algeria). Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 39, 5675–5691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01855-3
Alshamaa, Z. M., & Saleem, N. N. (2025). Black box software testing techniques: A literature review. Passer Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 1001–1011. https://doi.org/10.24271/psr.2025.508216.1963
Borinsky, A. D., & Idarwati. (2026). Analisis zona rawan bencana tanah longsor metode Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Studi kasus: Daerah Bukit Bual dan sekitarnya, Kabupaten Sijunjung dan Kota Sawahlunto, Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 6(4), 2487–2491. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceed.v6i4.1411
Damayanti, F., Sabri, L. M., & Wahyuddin, Y. (2023). Implementasi sistem informasi geografis untuk identifikasi daerah rawan tanah longsor (Studi kasus: Kapanewon Dlingo dan Kapanewon Imogiri, Kabupaten Bantul). Jurnal Geodesi Undip, 12(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.14710/jgundip.2023.38044
Farhan, M., & Azis, Z. (2026). Sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan lokasi kolam retensi berbasis AHP dan GIS di Kota Medan. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Studies, 4(6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.33151/ijomss.v4i6.1123
Hamdani, A. J., Rahmawati, Z. Y., Priyana, P. E., Zen, R. F., Suhartono, M. A. T. S. P., Mandiri, A. P., Puspita, S. M., Fitriawan, M. B., Ahsan, N. F., Setiawan, F. H., & Hanif, M. H. A. (2025). Analisis kerawanan longsor dengan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Information Value di Kecamatan Lembang–Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 23(5), 1253–1268. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.23.5.1253-1268
Hastuty, I. P., Mulia, A. P., Roesyanto, & Ahmad, F. (2026). Geospatial modeling-based assessment of landslide hazards along the Medan–Berastagi Route, North Sumatra. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 16(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.55493/5003.v16i1.5864
Kosasih, A. O., & Rizky, F. (2026). Sistem pendukung keputusan evaluasi kualitas udara Kota Binjai menggunakan Analytic Network Process dan Geostatistical Analysis. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Studies, 4(5), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.33151/ijomss.v4i5.1109
Mahmuda, R., Matondang, M. F. G., & Restu. (2026). Mapping landslide-risk zones and evacuation routes using network analysis in Karo Regency. Jurnal Spatial: Wahana Komunikasi dan Informasi Geografi, 26(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.21009/spatial.261.003
Mao, Y., Li, Y., Teng, F., Sabonchi, A. K. S., Azarafza, M., & Zhang, M. (2024). Utilizing hybrid machine learning and soft computing techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping in a drainage basin. Water, 16(3), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030380
Nadkarni, P. M., Marenco, L., Chen, R., Skoufos, E., Shepherd, G., & Miller, P. (1999). Organization of heterogeneous scientific data using the EAV/CR representation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 6(6), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1999.0060478
Rahman, M. M., Joy, M. F. R., Ahmed, A., Tabassum, A., Sarker, M. S., dkk. (2025). Comparative multi-criteria decision-making approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping in Khagrachhari district of southeastern Bangladesh. Discover Geoscience, 3, Article 237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00346-9
Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., Mihir, M., & Guzzetti, F. (2018). A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Science Reviews, 180, 60–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001
Rivera, C. A., Valqui-Reina, S. V., García-Naranjo, L. F., Ocaña-Zúñiga, C. L., Auquiñivin-Silva, E. A., Chapa-Gonza, S. R., Cieza-Tarrillo, D., Vergara, C. G., & Vergara, A. J. (2025). Geospatial landslide risk mapping using AHP and GIS: A case study of the Utcubamba River Basin, Peru. Applied Sciences, 15(17), 9423. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179423
Sari, D. P., Simanungkalit, N. M., & Novira, N. (2021). Landslide susceptibility mapping in Berastagi District Karo Regency based on Geographic Information Systems. Tunas Geografi, 10(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.24114/tgeo.v10i1.27902
Saygin, F., Şişman, Y., Dengiz, O., & Şişman, A. (2023). Spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping generated by fuzzy-AHP and decision tree approaches. Advances in Space Research, 71(12), 5218–5235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.01.057
Sur, U., Singh, P., & Meena, S. R. (2020). Landslide susceptibility assessment in a lesser Himalayan road corridor (India) applying fuzzy AHP technique and earth-observation data. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 11(1), 2176–2209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1836038
Tavakolifar, R., Shahabi, H., Alizadeh, M., Bateni, S. M., Hashim, M., Shirzadi, A., Ariffin, E. H., Wolf, I. D., & Chaeikar, S. S. (2023). Spatial prediction of landslides using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methods: A case study of the Saqqez–Marivan mountain road in Iran. Land, 12(6), 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061151
Vinueza-Martinez, J., Correa-Peralta, M., Ramirez-Anormaliza, R., Franco Arias, O., & Vera Paredes, D. (2024). Geographic Information Systems (GISs) based on WebGIS architecture: Bibliometric analysis of the current status and research trends. Sustainability, 16(15), 6439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156439
Wen, R., & Li, S. (2023). Spatial decision support systems with automated machine learning: A review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12010012
Zighmi, K., Zahri, F., Faqeih, K., Al Amri, A., Riheb, H., Alamri, S. M., & Alamery, E. (2025). AHP multi criteria analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Tellian Atlas chain. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 25747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10819-z
Zulfahmi, Z., Putra, M. H. Z., Sarah, D., Tohari, A., Madiutomo, N., Hartanto, P., & Damayanti, R. (2025). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping with a blended ensemble model and key influencing factors in Sentani, Papua, Indonesia. Geosciences, 15(10), 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15100390
Copyright (c) 2026 Adinda Nurul, Firahmi Rizky

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)












